Paper detail

Biased Showers - a common conceptual Framework for the Interpretation of High P_T Observables in Heavy-Ion Collisions

After the start of the LHC, a plethora of novel observables for jet tomography in heavy-ion collisions has appeared. Many of these studies have yielded counter-intuitive null results of apparently unmodified jets, which have sparked (sometimes exotic) theoretical efforts to explain these findings. However, it has to be realized that almost all current high P_T observables measure conditional probabilities of events, not probabilities. Thus, the correct starting point for their theoretical understanding is Bayes' formula, and the biases introduced by the conditioning are crucial to understanding the outcome. Once this is introduced properly into the modelling process, the counter-intuitive results are seen to find a natural explanation in terms of various biases and the puzzles largely disappear. In this work, a conceptual framework to classify the various observables according to the types of bias they are sensitive to is presented and illustrated with a large number of case studies ranging from simple jet finding to 2+1 dihadron triggered correlations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.