Paper detail

Biased sampling designs to improve research efficiency: Factors influencing pulmonary function over time in children with asthma

Substudies of the Childhood Asthma Management Program [Control. Clin. Trials 20 (1999) 91-120; N. Engl. J. Med. 343 (2000) 1054-1063] seek to identify patient characteristics associated with asthma symptoms and lung function. To determine if genetic measures are associated with trajectories of lung function as measured by forced vital capacity (FVC), children in the primary cohort study retrospectively had candidate loci evaluated. Given participant burden and constraints on financial resources, it is often desirable to target a subsample for ascertainment of costly measures. Methods that can leverage the longitudinal outcome on the full cohort to selectively measure informative individuals have been promising, but have been restricted in their use to analysis of the targeted subsample. In this paper we detail two multiple imputation analysis strategies that exploit outcome and partially observed covariate data on the nonsampled subjects, and we characterize alternative design and analysis combinations that could be used for future studies of pulmonary function and other outcomes. Candidate predictor (e.g., IL10 cytokine polymorphisms) associations obtained from targeted sampling designs can be estimated with very high efficiency compared to standard designs. Further, even though multiple imputation can dramatically improve estimation efficiency for covariates available on all subjects (e.g., gender and baseline age), relatively modest efficiency gains were observed in parameters associated with predictors that are exclusive to the targeted sample. Our results suggest that future studies of longitudinal trajectories can be efficiently conducted by use of outcome-dependent designs and associated full cohort analysis.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.