Paper detail

Biased Reionisation and Non-Gaussianity in Redshifted 21cm Intensity Maps of the Reionisation Epoch

Spatial dependence in the statistics of redshifted 21cm fluctuations promises to provide the most powerful probe of the reionisation epoch. In this paper we consider the second and third moments of the redshifted 21cm intensity distribution using a simple model that accounts for galaxy bias during the reionisation process. We demonstrate that skewness in redshifted 21cm maps should be substantial throughout the reionisation epoch and on all angular scales, owing to the effects of galaxy bias which leads to early reionisation in over-dense regions of the IGM. The variance (or power-spectrum) of 21cm fluctuations will exhibit a minimum in redshift part way through the reionisation process, when the global ionisation fraction is around 50%. This minimum is generic, and is due to the transition from 21cm intensity being dominated by over-dense too under-dense regions as reionisation progresses. We show that the details of the reionisation history, including the presence of radiative feedback are encoded in the evolution of the auto-correlation and skewness functions with redshift and mean IGM neutral fraction. We discuss the detection of skewness by first generation instruments, and conclude that the Mileura Widefield Array - Low Frequency Demonstrator will have sufficient sensitivity to detect skewness on a range of angular scales at redshifts near the end of reionisation, while a subsequent instrument of 10 times the collecting area could map out the evolution of skewness in detail. The observation of a minimum in variance during the reionisation history, and the detection of skewness would both provide important confirmation of the cosmological origin of redshifted 21cm intensity fluctuations.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.