Paper detail

Bianchi I Model: An Alternative Way To Model The Presentday Universe

Although the new era of high precision cosmology of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation improves our knowledge to understand the infant as well as the presentday Universe, it also leads us to question the main assumption of the exact isotropy of the CMB. There are two pieces of observational evidence that hint towards there being no exact isotropy. These are first the existence of small anisotropy deviations from isotropy of the CMB radiation and second, the presence of large angle anomalies, although the existence of these anomalies is currently a huge matter of debate. These hints are particularly important since isotropy is one of the two main postulates of the Copernican principle on which the FRW models are built. This almost isotropic CMB radiation implies that the universe is almost a FRW universe, as is proved by previous studies. Assuming the matter component forms the deviations from isotropy in the CMB density fluctuations when matter and radiation decouples, we here attempt to find possible constraints on the FRW type scale and Hubble parameter by using the Bianchi type I (BI) anisotropic model which is asymptotically equivalent to the standard FRW. To obtain constraints on such an anisotropic model, we derive average and late-time shear values that come from the anisotropy upper limits of the recent Planck data based on a model independent shear parameter of Maartens et al. (1995a,b) and from the theoretical consistency relation. These constraints lead us to obtain a BI model which becomes an almost-FRW model in time, and which is consistent with the latest observational data of the CMB.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.