Paper detail

Bi-Lipschitz parts of quasisymmetric mappings

A natural quantity that measures how well a map $f:\mathbb{R}^{d}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{D}$ is approximated by an affine transformation is \[ω_{f}(x,r)=\inf_{A}\left(\frac{1}{|B(x,r)|}\int_{B(x,r)}\left(\frac{|f-A|}{|A'|r}\right)^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}},\] where the infimum ranges over all non constant affine transformations. This is natural insofar as it is invariant under rescaling $f$ in either its domain or image. We show that if $f:\mathbb{R}^{d}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{D}$ is quasisymmetric and its image has a sufficient amount of rectifiable structure (although not necessarily $\mathcal{H}^{d}$-finite), then $ω_{f}(x,r)^{2}\frac{dxdr}{r}$ is a Carleson measure on $\mathbb{R}^{d}\times(0,\infty)$. Moreover, this is an equivalence: the existence of such a Carleson measure implies that, in every ball $B(x,r)\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d}$, there is a set $E$ occupying 90$%$ of $B(x,r)$, say, upon which $f$ is bi-Lipschitz (and hence guaranteeing rectifiable pieces in the image). En route, we make a minor adjustment to a theorem of Semmes to show that quasisymmetric maps of subsets of $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ into $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ are bi-Lipschitz on a large subset quantitatively.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.