Paper detail

Bi-layer voter model: Modeling intolerant/tolerant positions and bots in opinion dynamics

The diffusion of opinions in Social Networks is a relevant process for adopting positions and attracting potential voters in political campaigns. Opinion polarization, bias, targeted diffusion, and the radicalization of postures are key elements for understanding voting dynamics. In particular, social bots are a new element that can have a pronounced effect on the formation of opinions during elections by, for instance, creating fake accounts in social networks to manipulate elections. Here we propose a voter model incorporating bots and radical or intolerant individuals in the decision-making process. The dynamics of the system occur in a multiplex network of interacting agents composed of two layers, one for the dynamics of opinions where agents choose between two possible alternatives, and the other for the tolerance dynamics, in which agents adopt one of two tolerance levels. The tolerance accounts for the likelihood to change opinion in an interaction, with tolerant (intolerant) agents switching opinion with probability $1.0$ ($γ\le 1$). We find that intolerance leads to a consensus of tolerant agents during an initial stage that scales as $τ^+ \sim γ^{-1} \ln N$, who then reach an opinion consensus during the second stage in a time that scales as $τ\sim N$, where $N$ is the number of agents. Therefore, very intolerant agents ($γ\ll 1$) could considerably slow down dynamics towards the final consensus state. We also find that the inclusion of a fraction $σ_{\mathbb{B}}^-$ of bots breaks the symmetry between both opinions, driving the system to a consensus of intolerant agents with the bots' opinion. Thus, bots eventually impose their opinion to the entire population, in a time that scales as $τ_B^- \sim γ^{-1}$ for $γ\ll σ_{\mathbb{B}}^-$ and $τ_B^- \sim 1/σ_{\mathbb{B}}^-$ for $σ_{\mathbb{B}}^- \ll γ$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.