Paper detail

Bi-Arc Digraphs and Conservative Polymorphisms

In this paper we study the class of bi-arc digraphs, important from two seemingly unrelated perspectives. On the one hand, they are precisely the digraphs that admit certain polymorphisms of interest in the study of constraint satisfaction problems; on the other hand, they are a very broad generalization of interval graphs. Bi-arc digraphs is the class of digraphs that admit conservative semilattice polymorphisms. There is much interest in understanding structures that admit particular types of polymorphisms, and especially in their recognition algorithms. (Such problems are referred to as metaproblems.) Surprisingly, the class of bi-arc digraphs also describes the class of digraphs that admit certain other kinds of conservative polymorphisms. Thus solving the recognition problem for bi-arc digraphs solves the metaproblem for digraphs for several types of conservative polymorphisms. The complexity of the recognition problem for digraphs with conservative semilattice polymorphisms was an open problem, while it was known to be NP-complete for certain more complex relational structures. We complement our result by providing a complete dichotomy classification of which general relational structures have polynomial or NP-complete recognition problems for the existence of conservative semilattice polymorphisms. Bi-arc digraphs also generalizes the class of interval graphs; in fact it reduces to the class of interval graphs for symmetric and reflexive digraphs. It is much broader than interval graphs and includes other generalizations of interval graphs such as co-threshold tolerance graphs and adjusted interval digraphs. Yet, it is still a reasonable extension of interval graphs, in the sense that it keeps much of the appeal of interval graphs. Our main result is a forbidden obstruction characterization of, and a polynomial recognition for, the class of bi-arc digraphs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.