Paper detail

Beyond the Knudsen number: assessing thermodynamic non-equilibrium in gas flows

For more than 150 years the Navier-Stokes equations for thermodynamically quasi-equilibrium flows have been the cornerstone of modern computational fluid dynamics that underpins new fluid technologies. However, the applicable regime of the Navier-Stokes model in terms of the level of thermodynamic non-equilibrium in the local flowfield is not clear especially for hypersonic and low-speed micro/nano flows. Here, we re-visit the Navier-Stokes model in the framework of Boltzmann statistics, and propose a new and more appropriate way of assessing non-equilibrium in the local flowfield, and the corresponding appropriateness of the Navier-Stokes model. Our theoretical analysis and numerical simulations confirm our proposed method. Through molecular dynamics simulations we reveal that the commonly-used Knudsen number, or a parametric combination of Knudsen and Mach numbers, may not be sufficient to accurately assess the departure of flowfields from equilibrium, and the applicability of the Navier-Stokes model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.