Paper detail

Beyond the Cassie-Baxter Model: New Insights for Predicting Imbibition in Complex Systems

We revisit the classical problem of liquid imbibition in a single pore with spatially varying wettability. Starting from the Lucas-Washburn equation, we derive analytical solutions for the imbibition time (crossing time) in systems where wettability alternates between two materials. For ordered arrangements, we demonstrate that the imbibition speed depends non-trivially on the spatial distribution, with the "more hydrophobic-first" configuration being optimal. For disordered systems, where segment lengths follow a Gaussian distribution, we show that the classical Cassie-Baxter contact angle, originally derived for static wetting, fails to predict the dynamics of capillary-driven flow. To address this, we propose a new weighted harmonic averaging method for the contact angle, which accurately describes the viscous crossing time in such heterogeneous systems. Our findings reveal fundamental insights into the role of wettability heterogeneity in capillary-driven flow, offering a basis for understanding imbibition dynamics in complex heterogeneous systems. The research data and the software supporting this study are openly available at DOI:10.5281/zenodo.14537452.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.