Abstract
We show how the necessary and sufficient conditions for the NFL to apply can be reduced to the single requirement of the set of objective functions under consideration being closed under permutation, and quantify the extent to which a set of objectives not closed under permutation can give rise to a performance difference between two algorithms. Then we provide a more refined definition of performance under which we show that revisiting algorithms are always trumped by enumerative ones.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.