Paper detail

Beyond Chance-Constrained Convex Mixed-Integer Optimization: A Generalized Calafiore-Campi Algorithm and the notion of $S$-optimization

The scenario approach developed by Calafiore and Campi to attack chance-constrained convex programs utilizes random sampling on the uncertainty parameter to substitute the original problem with a representative continuous convex optimization with $N$ convex constraints which is a relaxation of the original. Calafiore and Campi provided an explicit estimate on the size $N$ of the sampling relaxation to yield high-likelihood feasible solutions of the chance-constrained problem. They measured the probability of the original constraints to be violated by the random optimal solution from the relaxation of size $N$. This paper has two main contributions. First, we present a generalization of the Calafiore-Campi results to both integer and mixed-integer variables. In fact, we demonstrate that their sampling estimates work naturally for variables restricted to some subset $S$ of $\mathbb R^d$. The key elements are generalizations of Helly's theorem where the convex sets are required to intersect $S \subset \mathbb R^d$. The size of samples in both algorithms will be directly determined by the $S$-Helly numbers. Motivated by the first half of the paper, for any subset $S \subset \mathbb R^d$, we introduce the notion of an $S$-optimization problem, where the variables take on values over $S$. It generalizes continuous, integer, and mixed-integer optimization. We illustrate with examples the expressive power of $S$-optimization to capture sophisticated combinatorial optimization problems with difficult modular constraints. We reinforce the evidence that $S$-optimization is "the right concept" by showing that the well-known randomized sampling algorithm of K. Clarkson for low-dimensional convex optimization problems can be extended to work with variables taking values over $S$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.