Paper detail

Best Relay Selection in Gaussian Half-Duplex Diamond Networks

This paper considers Gaussian half-duplex diamond $n$-relay networks, where a source communicates with a destination by hopping information through one layer of $n$ non-communicating relays that operate in half-duplex. The main focus consists of investigating the following question: What is the contribution of a single relay on the approximate capacity of the entire network? In particular, approximate capacity refers to a quantity that approximates the Shannon capacity within an additive gap which only depends on $n$, and is independent of the channel parameters. This paper answers the above question by providing a fundamental bound on the ratio between the approximate capacity of the highest-performing single relay and the approximate capacity of the entire network, for any number $n$. Surprisingly, it is shown that such a ratio guarantee is $f = 1/(2+2\cos(2π/(n+2)))$, that is a sinusoidal function of $n$, which decreases as $n$ increases. It is also shown that the aforementioned ratio guarantee is tight, i.e., there exist Gaussian half-duplex diamond $n$-relay networks, where the highest-performing relay has an approximate capacity equal to an $f$ fraction of the approximate capacity of the entire network.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.