Paper detail

Benchmarking the viability of 3D printed micromodels for single phase flow using Particle Image Velocimetry and Direct Numerical Simulations

Holistic understanding of multiphase reactive flow mechanisms such as CO$_2$ dissolution, multiphase displacement, and snap-off events are vital for optimisation of large-scale industrial operations like CO$_2$ sequestration, enhanced oil recovery, and geothermal energy. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing allow for cheap and fast manufacturing of complex porosity models, which enable investigation of specific flow processes in a repeatable manner as well as sensitivity analysis for small geometry alterations. However, there are concerns regarding dimensional fidelity, shape conformity and surface quality, and therefore the printing quality and printer limitations must be benchmarked. We present an experimental investigation into the ability of 3D printing to generate custom-designed micromodels accurately and repeatably down to a minimum pore throat size of 140 micrometers, which is representative of the average pore-throat size in coarse sandstones. Homogeneous and heterogeneous micromodel geometries are designed, then the 3D printing process is optimised to achieve repeatable experiments with single-phase fluid flow. Finally, Particle Image Velocimetry is used to compare the velocity map obtained from flow experiments in 3D printed micromodels with the map generated with direct numerical simulation (OpenFOAM software) and an accurate match is obtained. This work indicates that 3D printed micromodels can be used to accurately investigate pore-scale processes present in CO$_2$ sequestration, enhanced oil recovery and geothermal energy applications more cheapely than traditional micromodel methods.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.