Paper detail

BenchHAR: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Generalizable Sensor-based Activity Recognition

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) from wearable sensors supports broad healthcare and behavior science applications. However, data heterogeneity and the scarcity of labeled data limit its real-world generalization. Recent advances in self-supervised learning (SSL) in vision and language domains have shown strong capability for learning generalizable representations from unlabeled data. Yet, few studies have systematically compared the generalization performance of SSL methods or explored how to adapt them for generalizable HAR. To address these gaps, we present BenchHAR, a unified framework for evaluating the generalization capability of SSL methods for sensor-based HAR on unseen target distributions. BenchHAR curates a large-scale dataset (~258K samples) and evaluates eight representative SSL methods across 12 encoder-classifier architectures. Our results reveal that existing SSL methods struggle to achieve satisfactory generalization performance. We find that: (1) For HAR models, the hybrid paradigm (combining reconstruction and contrastive pretraining) achieves the best overall performance. The CNN encoder exhibits the strongest ability to learn generalizable representations, while more expressive classifier architectures further improve generalization. (2) For data scale, increasing the amount of pretraining data from downstream activity classes consistently improves generalization, while adding more labeled data yields limited gains. Interestingly, incorporating unlabeled data from non-downstream activity classes does not improve generalization. (3) Sensor data collected from custom-grade devices generalizes better than that from research-grade devices, and data from limb transfers more effectively to trunk positions. BenchHAR provides a unified benchmark and actionable insights for generalizable sensor-based HAR systems. Our code is available at https://github.com/saiketa/HAR-Bench.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.