Paper detail

Bell's inequality for conditional probabilities as a test for quantum-like behaviour of mind

We define quantum-like probabilistic behaviour as behaviour which is impossible to describe by using the classical probability model. We discuss the conjecture that cognitive behaviour is quantum-like. There is presented the scheme for an experimental test for quantum-like cognitive behaviour based on a generalization of the famous Bell's inequality. This generalization is an analogue of Bell's inequality, but for conditional probabilities. The use of conditional probabilities (instead of simultaneous probability distributions for pairs of observables in the original Bell's inequality) gives the possibility to separate two problems which are mixed in the original Bell's framework: nonlocality and nonclassical (quantum-like) probabilistic behaviour. Our inequality for conditional probabilities can be used for experiments with a single system (so we need not to prepare pairs of correlated systems) to find quantum-like behaviour. This possibility is extremely important in cognitive sciences where it is practically impossible to prepare pairs of precisely correlated cognitive systems.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.