Paper detail

Bekenstein's generalized second law of thermodynamics: The role of the hoop conjecture

Bekenstein's generalized second law (GSL) of thermodynamics asserts that the sum of black-hole entropy, $S_{\text{BH}}=Ac^3/4\hbar G$ (here $A$ is the black-hole surface area), and the ordinary entropy of matter and radiation fields in the black-hole exterior region never decreases. We here re-analyze an intriguing gedanken experiment which was designed by Bekenstein to challenge the GSL. In this historical gedanken experiment an entropy-bearing box is lowered into a charged Reissner-Nordström black hole. For the GSL to work, the resulting increase in the black-hole surface area (entropy) must compensate for the loss of the box's entropy. We show that if the box can be lowered adiabatically all the way down to the black-hole horizon, as previously assumed in the literature, then for near-extremal black holes the resulting increase in black-hole surface-area (due to the assimilation of the box by the black hole) may become too small to compensate for the loss of the box's entropy. In order to resolve this apparent violation of the GSL, we here suggest to use a generalized version of the hoop conjecture. In particular, assuming that a physical system of mass $M$ and electric charge $Q$ forms a black hole if its circumference radius $r_{\text{c}}$ is equal to (or smaller than) the corresponding Reissner-Nordström black-hole radius $r_{\text{RN}}=M+\sqrt{M^2-Q^2}$, we prove that a new (and larger) horizon is already formed before the entropy-bearing box reaches the horizon of the original near-extremal black hole. This result, which seems to have been overlooked in previous analyzes of the composed black-hole-box system, ensures the validity of Bekenstein's GSL in this famous gedanken experiment.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.