Paper detail

Beautiful secrets: using aesthetic images to authenticate users

We propose and evaluate an authentication scheme that improves usability and user experience issues in the authentication process due to its reliance on people's aesthetic tastes and preferences. The scheme uses aesthetic images to verify the identity of computer users. It relies on three major premises regarding visual aesthetics: (i) that an individual has different preferences for different aesthetic stimuli; (ii) that these preferences are relatively consistent; and (iii) that aesthetic tastes are subjective and, therefore, there are considerable individual differences in aesthetic preferences. Following a review of the scientific basis for these premises, we describe the concept of the aesthetic evaluation-based authentication (AEbA) method and illustrate an implementation of it. We address AEbA's advantages and disadvantages relative to other related methods and conclude that it is adequate for low-to-medium security domains. It cannot serve as a compulsory method because we suspect that a certain portion of the user population lacks the degree of aesthetic sensitivity required to use the system effectively. On the plus side, the method offers a positive experience. It alleviates the burden of memorizing passwords to a minimum, and relative to other usability-oriented schemes provides better security in terms of shoulder-surfing, phishing, and password space. Finally, we report on a pilot evaluation of the concept and its feasibility that supports the method's main tenets, provides insights about implementation challenges and suggestions for improvements.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.