Paper detail

Beating O(nm) in approximate LZW-compressed pattern matching

Given an LZW/LZ78 compressed text, we want to find an approximate occurrence of a given pattern of length m. The goal is to achieve time complexity depending on the size n of the compressed representation of the text instead of its length. We consider two specific definitions of approximate matching, namely the Hamming distance and the edit distance, and show how to achieve O(nm^0.5k^2) and O(nm^0.5k^3) running time, respectively, where k is the bound on the distance. Both algorithms use just linear space. Even for very small values of k, the best previously known solutions required O(nm) time. Our main contribution is applying a periodicity-based argument in a way that is computationally effective even if we need to operate on a compressed representation of a string, while the previous solutions were either based on a dynamic programming, or a black-box application of tools developed for uncompressed strings.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.