Paper detail

Beamwidth Selection for a Uniform Planar Array (UPA) Using RT-ICM mmWave Clusters

Beamforming is the primary technology to overcome the high path loss in millimeter-wave (mmWave) channels. Hence, performance improvement needs knowledge and control of the spatial domain. In particular, antenna structure and radiation parameters affect the beamforming performance in mmWave communications systems. In order to address the impairments such as beam misalignments, outage loss, tracking inability, blockage, etc., an optimum value of the beamwidth must be determined. In our previous paper, assuming a communication system that creates a beam per cluster, we theoretically investigated the beamwidth-received power relation in the cluster level mmWave channels. We used uniform linear array (ULA) antenna in our analysis. In this paper, we revisit the analysis and update the expressions for the scenario where we use rectangular uniform planar array (R-UPA) antenna. Rectangular beam model is considered to approximate the main lobe pattern of the antenna. For the channel, we derive beamwidth-dependent extracted power expressions for two intra-cluster channel models, IEEE 802.11ad and our previous work based on ray-tracing (RT-ICM). Combining antenna and channel gains, in case of the perfect alignment, we confirm that the optimum beamwidth converges zero. Performing asymptotic analysis of the received power, we give the formulation and insights that the practical nonzero beamwidth values can be achieved although sacrificing subtle from the maximum received power. Our analysis shows that to reach 95% of the maximum power for a typical indoor mmWave cluster, a practical beamwidth of 3.5 deg is enough. Finally, our analysis results show that there is a 13 dB increase in the maximum theoretical received power when UPA is used over ULA. We show that an 8 x 8 UPA can reach 50% of that maximum received power while the received power is still 10 dB larger than the ULA scenario.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.