Paper detail

Bayesian Reconstruction of Gravitational-wave Signals from Binary Black Holes with Nonzero Eccentricities

We present a comprehensive study on how well gravitational-wave signals of binary black holes with nonzero eccentricities can be recovered with state of the art model-independent waveform reconstruction and parameter estimation techniques. For this we use BayesWave, a Bayesian algorithm used by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration for unmodeled reconstructions of signal waveforms and parameters. We used two different waveform models to produce simulated signals of binary black holes with eccentric orbits and embed them in samples of simulated noise of design-sensitivity Advanced LIGO detectors. We studied the network overlaps and point estimates of central moments of signal waveforms recovered by BayesWave as a function of $e$, the eccentricity of the binary at 8 Hz orbital frequency. BayesWave recovers signals of near-circular ($e\lesssim0.2$) and highly eccentric ($e\gtrsim0.7$) binaries with network overlaps similar to that of circular ($e=0$) ones, however it produces lower network overlaps for binaries with $e\in[0.2,0.7]$. Estimation errors on central frequencies and bandwidths (measured relative to bandwidths) are nearly independent from $e$, while estimation errors on central times and durations (measured relative to durations) increase and decrease with $e$ above $e\gtrsim0.5$, respectively. We also tested how BayesWave performs when reconstructions are carried out using generalized wavelets with linear frequency evolution (chirplets) instead of sine-Gaussian wavelets. We have found that network overlaps improve by $\sim 10-20$ percent when chirplets are used, and the improvement is the highest at low ($e<0.5$) eccentricities. There is however no significant change in the estimation errors of central moments when the chirplet base is used.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.