Paper detail

Bayesian item response models for citizen science ecological data

So-called 'citizen science' data elicited from crowds has become increasingly popular in many fields including ecology. However, the quality of this information is being frequently debated by many within the scientific community. Therefore, modern citizen science implementations require measures of the users' proficiency that account for the difficulty of the tasks. We introduce a new methodological framework of item response and linear logistic test models with application to citizen science data used in ecology research. This approach accommodates spatial autocorrelation within the item difficulties and produces relevant ecological measures of species and site-related difficulties, discriminatory power and guessing behavior. These, along with estimates of the subject abilities allow better management of these programs and provide deeper insights. This paper also highlights the fit of item response models to big data via divide-and-conquer. We found that the suggested methods outperform the traditional item response models in terms of RMSE, accuracy, and WAIC based on leave-one-out cross-validation on simulated and empirical data. We present a comprehensive implementation using a case study of species identification in the Serengeti, Tanzania. The R and Stan codes are provided for full reproducibility. Multiple statistical illustrations and visualizations are given which allow practitioners the extrapolation to a wide range of citizen science ecological problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.