Paper detail

Bayesian Inference of the Symmetry Energy of Super-Dense Neutron-Rich Matter from Future Radius Measurements of Massive Neutron Stars

Using an explicitly isospin-dependent parametric Equation of State (EOS) for the core of neutron stars (NSs) within the Bayesian statistical approach, we infer the EOS parameters of super-dense neutron-rich nuclear matter from three sets of imagined mass-radius correlation data representing typical predictions by various nuclear many-body theories, i.e, the radius stays the same, decreases or increases with increasing NS mass within $\pm 15\%$ between 1.4 M$_{\odot}$ and 2.0 M$_{\odot}$. The corresponding average density increases quickly, slowly or slightly decreases as the NS mass increases from 1.4 M$_{\odot}$ to 2.0 M$_{\odot}$. Using the posterior probability distribution functions (PDFs) of EOS parameters inferred from GW170817 and NICER radius data for canonical NSs as references, we investigate how future radius measurements of massive NS will improve our knowledge about the EOS of super-dense neutron-rich nuclear matter, especially its symmetry energy term, compared to what people have already learned from analyzing the GW170817 and NICER data. While the EOS of symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) inferred from the three data sets are approximately the same, the corresponding high-density symmetry energies at densities above about $2ρ_0$ are very different, indicating that the radii of massive NSs carry reliable information about the high-density behavior of nuclear symmetry energy with little influence from the remaining uncertainties of the SNM EOS.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.