Paper detail

Bayesian inference of numerical modeling-based morphodynamics: Application to a dam-break over a mobile bed experiment

Numerical modeling of morphodynamics presents significant challenges in engineering due to uncertainties arising from inaccurate inputs, model errors, and limited computing resources. Accurate results are essential for optimizing strategies and reducing costs. This paper presents a step-by-step Bayesian methodology to conduct an uncertainty analysis of 2D numerical modeling-based morphodynamics, exemplified by a dam-break over a sand bed experiment. Initially, uncertainties from prior knowledge are propagated through the dynamical model using the Monte Carlo technique. This approach estimates the relative influence of each input parameter on results, identifying the most relevant parameters and observations for Bayesian inference and creating a numerical database for emulator construction. Given the computationally intensive simulations of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, a neural network emulator is used to approximate the complex 2D numerical model efficiently. Subsequently, a Bayesian framework is employed to characterize input parameter uncertainty variability and produce probability-based predictions.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.