Paper detail

Bayesian Hierarchical Methods for Modeling Electrical Grid Component Failures

Failure probabilities for grid components are often estimated using parametric models which can capitalize on operational grid data. This work formulates a Bayesian hierarchical framework designed to integrate data and domain expertise to understand the failure properties of a regional power system, where variability in the expected performance of individual components gives rise to failure processes that are heterogeneous and uncertain. We use Bayesian methods to fit failure models to failure data generated in simulation. We test our algorithm by evaluating differences between the data-generating model, our Bayesian hierarchical model, and maximum likelihood parameter estimates. We evaluate how well each model can approximate the failure properties of individual components, and of the system overall. Finally, we define an upgrade policy for achieving targeted reductions in risk exposure, and compare the magnitude of upgrades recommended by each model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.