Paper detail

Bayesian fit analysis to full distribution data of $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \ell\barν$: $|V_{cb}|$ determination and New Physics constraints

We investigate the semi-leptonic decays of $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \ell\barν$ in terms of the Heavy-Quark-Effective-Theory (HQET) parameterization for the form factors, which is described with the heavy quark expansion up to $\mathcal O(1/m_c^2)$ beyond the simple approximation considered in the original CLN parameterization. An analysis with this setup was first given in the literature, and then we extend it to the comprehensive analyses including (i) simultaneous fit of $|V_{cb}|$ and the HQET parameters to available experimental full distribution data and theory constraints, and (ii) New Physics (NP) contributions of the $V_2$ and $T$ types to the decay distributions and rates. For this purpose, we perform Bayesian fit analyses by using Stan program, a state-of-the-art public platform for statistical computation. Then, we show that our $|V_{cb}|$ fit results for the SM scenarios are close to the PDG combined average from the exclusive mode, and indicate significance of the angular distribution data. In turn, for the $\text{SM} + \text{NP}$ scenarios, our fit analyses find that non-zero NP contribution is favored at the best fit point for both $\text{SM} + V_2$ and $\text{SM} + T$ depending on the HQET parameterization model. A key feature is then realized in the $\bar B \to D^{(*)} τ\barν$ observables. Our fit result of the HQET parameters in the $\text{SM} (+T)$ produces a consistent value for $R_D$ while smaller for $R_{D^*}$, compared with the previous SM prediction in the HFLAV report. On the other hand, $\text{SM}+V_2$ points to smaller and larger values for $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ than the SM predictions. In particular, the $R_{D^*}$ deviation from the experimental measurement becomes smaller, which could be interesting for future improvement on measurements at the Belle II experiment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.