Paper detail

Bayesian constraints on dark matter halo properties using gravitationally-lensed supernovae

A hierarchical Bayesian method is applied to the analysis of Type-Ia supernovae (SNIa) observations to constrain the properties of the dark matter haloes of galaxies along the SNIa lines-of-sight via their gravitational lensing effect. The full joint posterior distribution of the dark matter halo parameters is explored using the nested sampling algorithm {\sc MultiNest}, which also efficiently calculates the Bayesian evidence, thereby facilitating robust model comparison. We first demonstrate the capabilities of the method by applying it to realistic simulated SNIa data, based on the real 3-year data release from the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS3). Assuming typical values for the halo parameters in our simulations, we find that a catalogue analogous to the existing SNLS3 data set is incapable of detecting the lensing signal, but a catalogue containing approximately three times as many SNIa does produce robust and accurate parameter constraints and model selection results for two halo models: a truncated singular isothermal sphere (SIS) and a Navarro--Frenk--White (NFW) profile, thereby validating our analysis methodology. In the analysis of the real SNLS3 data, contrary to previous studies, we obtain only a very marginal detection of a lensing signal and weak constraints on the halo parameters for the truncated SIS model, although these constraints are tighter than those obtained from the equivalent simulated SNIa data set. This difference is driven by a preferred value of $η\approx 1$ in the assumed scaling-law $σ\propto L^η$ between velocity dispersion and luminosity, which is somewhat higher than the canonical values of $η= \tfrac{1}{4}$ and $η= \tfrac{1}{3}$ for early and late-type galaxies, respectively, and leads to a stronger lensing effect by the halo. No detection of a lensing signal is made for the NFW model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.