Paper detail

Bayesian calibration of traffic flow fundamental diagrams using Gaussian processes

Modeling the relationship between vehicle speed and density on the road is a fundamental problem in traffic flow theory. Recent research found that using the least-squares (LS) method to calibrate single-regime speed-density models is biased because of the uneven distribution of samples. This paper explains the issue of the LS method from a statistical perspective: the biased calibration is caused by the correlations/dependencies in regression residuals. Based on this explanation, we propose a new calibration method for single-regime speed-density models by modeling the covariance of residuals via a zero-mean Gaussian Process (GP). Our approach can be viewed as a generalized least-squares (GLS) method with a specific covariance structure (i.e., kernel function) and is a generalization of the existing LS and the weighted least-squares (WLS) methods. Next, we use a sparse approximation to address the scalability issue of GPs and apply a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling scheme to obtain the posterior distributions of the parameters for speed-density models and the hyperparameters (i.e., length scale and variance) of the GP kernel. Finally, we calibrate six well-known single-regime speed-density models with the proposed method. Results show that the proposed GP-based methods (1) significantly reduce the biases in the LS calibration, (2) achieve a similar effect as the WLS method, (3) can be used as a non-parametric speed-density model, and (4) provide a Bayesian solution to estimate posterior distributions of parameters and speed-density functions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.