Paper detail

Bayesian Appraisal of Random Series Convergence with Application to Climate Change

Roy and Bhattacharya (2020) provided Bayesian characterization of infinite series, and their most important application, namely, to the Dirichlet series characterizing the (in)famous Riemann Hypothesis, revealed insights that are not in support of the most celebrated conjecture for over 150 years. In contrast with deterministic series considered by Roy and Bhattacharya (2020), in this article we take up random infinite series for our investigation. Remarkably, our method does not require any simplifying assumption. Albeit the Bayesian characterization theory for random series is no different from that for the deterministic setup, construction of effective upper bounds for partial sums, required for implementation, turns out to be a challenging undertaking in the random setup. In this article, we construct parametric and nonparametric upper bound forms for the partial sums of random infinite series and demonstrate the generality of the latter in comparison to the former. Simulation studies exhibit high accuracy and efficiency of the nonparametric bound in all the setups that we consider. Finally, exploiting the property that the summands tend to zero in the case of series convergence, we consider application of our nonparametric bound driven Bayesian method to global climate change analysis. Specifically, analyzing the global average temperature record over the years 1850--2016 and Holocene global average temperature reconstruction data 12,000 years before present, we conclude, in spite of the current global warming situation, that global climate dynamics is subject to temporary variability only, the current global warming being an instance, and long term global warming or cooling either in the past or in the future, are highly unlikely.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.