Paper detail

Battle between Rate and Error in Minimizing Age of Information

In this paper, we consider a status update system, in which update packets are sent to the destination via a wireless medium that allows for multiple rates, where a higher rate also naturally corresponds to a higher error probability. The data freshness is measured using age of information, which is defined as the age of the recent update at the destination. A packet that is transmitted with a higher rate, will encounter a shorter delay and a higher error probability. Thus, the choice of the transmission rate affects the age at the destination. In this paper, we design a low-complexity scheduler that selects between two different transmission rate and error probability pairs to be used at each transmission epoch. This problem can be cast as a Markov Decision Process. We show that there exists a threshold-type policy that is age-optimal. More importantly, we show that the objective function is quasi-convex or non-decreasing in the threshold, based on to the system parameters values. This enables us to devise a \emph{low-complexity algorithm} to minimize the age. These results reveal an interesting phenomenon: While choosing the rate with minimum mean delay is delay-optimal, this does not necessarily minimize the age.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.