Paper detail

BASS XXV: DR2 Broad-line Based Black Hole Mass Estimates and Biases from Obscuration

We present measurements of broad emission lines and virial estimates of supermassive black hole masses ($M_{BH}$) for a large sample of ultra-hard X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) as part of the second data release of the BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS/DR2). Our catalog includes $M_{BH}$ estimates for a total 689 AGNs, determined from the H$α$, H$β$, $MgII\lambda2798$, and/or $CIV\lambda1549$ broad emission lines. The core sample includes a total of 512 AGNs drawn from the 70-month Swift/BAT all-sky catalog. We also provide measurements for 177 additional AGNs that are drawn from deeper Swift/BAT survey data. We study the links between $M_{BH}$ estimates and line-of-sight obscuration measured from X-ray spectral analysis. We find that broad H$α$ emission lines in obscured AGNs ($\log (N_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-2})> 22.0$) are on average a factor of $8.0_{-2.4}^{+4.1}$ weaker, relative to ultra-hard X-ray emission, and about $35_{-12}^{~+7}$\% narrower than in unobscured sources (i.e., $\log (N_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-2}) < 21.5$). This indicates that the innermost part of the broad-line region is preferentially absorbed. Consequently, current single-epoch $M_{BH}$ prescriptions result in severely underestimated ($>$1 dex) masses for Type 1.9 sources (AGNs with broad H$α$ but no broad H$β$) and/or sources with $\log (N_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-2}) > 22.0$. We provide simple multiplicative corrections for the observed luminosity and width of the broad H$α$ component ($L[{\rm b}{\rm H}α]$ and FWHM[bH$α$]) in such sources to account for this effect, and to (partially) remedy $M_{BH}$ estimates for Type 1.9 objects. As key ingredient of BASS/DR2, our work provides the community with the data needed to further study powerful AGNs in the low-redshift Universe.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access29 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.