Paper detail

Basic N-Body Modelling of the Evolution of Globular Clusters. I. Time Scaling

We consider the use of N-body simulations for studying the evolution of rich star clusters (i.e. globular clusters). The dynamical processes included in this study are restricted to gravitational (point-mass) interactions, the steady tidal field of a galaxy, and instantaneous mass loss resulting from stellar evolution. With evolution driven by these mechanisms, it is known that clusters fall roughly into two broad classes: those that dissipate promptly in the tidal field, as a result of mass loss, and those that survive long enough for their evolution to become dominated by two-body relaxation. The time scales of the processes we consider scale in different ways with the number of stars in the simulation, and the main aim of the paper is to suggest how the scaling of a simulation should be done so that the results are representative of the evolution of a `real' cluster. We investigate three different ways of scaling time. One of these is appropriate to the first type of cluster, i.e. those that dissipate rapidly, and similarly a second scaling is appropriate only to the second (relaxation-dominated) type. We also develop a hybrid scaling which is a satisfactory compromise for both types of cluster. Finally we present evidence that the widely used Fokker-Planck method produces models which are in good agreement with N-body models of those clusters which are relaxation dominated, at least for N-body models with several thousand particles, but that the Fokker-Planck models evolve too fast for clusters which dissipate promptly.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.