Paper detail

Base-Rate Fallacy Redux and a Deep Dive Review in Cybersecurity

This paper examines the current state of the science underlying cybersecurity research with an emphasis on the non-signature-based intrusion detection domain. First, the paper re-examines the base-rate fallacy originally published by Axelsson, putting the impact of false positives into context. Given the relative high numbers of false positives, the paper argues for deeper analysis of false positives, akin to the analysis that true positives are treated to. The second section of the paper examines the metrics being used to analyze non-signature intrusion detection techniques, the current status quo of employed metrics, and the impact of the status quo on scientific advancement. Finally, the paper analyzes the use of online attack graphs and their applicability, especially in scenarios of constrained environments, such as Internet of Things devices. The use of offline attack graphs in such constrained environments is also examined. In essence, a deep dive review identified multiple areas throughout the field in which the effectiveness and validity of the scientific method can be greatly improved, e.g., through removal of logical fallacies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.