Paper detail

Base collapse of holographic algorithms

A holographic algorithm solves a problem in domain of size $n$, by reducing it to counting perfect matchings in planar graphs. It may simulate a $n$-value variable by a bunch of $t$ matchgate bits, which has $2^t$ values. The transformation in the simulation can be expressed as a $n \times 2^t$ matrix $M$, called the base of the holographic algorithm. We wonder whether more matchgate bits bring us more powerful holographic algorithms. In another word, whether we can solve the same original problem, with a collapsed base of size $n \times 2^{r}$, where $r<t$. Base collapse was discovered for small domain $n=2,3,4$. For $n=3, 4$, the base collapse was proved under the condition that there is a full rank generator. We prove for any $n$, the base collapse to a $r\leq \lfloor \log n \rfloor$, with some similar conditions. One of them is that the original problem is defined by one symmetric function. In the proof, we utilize elementary matchgate transformations instead of matchgate identities.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.