Paper detail

Baryon masses at second order in large-$N$ chiral perturbation theory

We consider flavor breaking in the the octet and decuplet baryon masses at second order in large-$N$ chiral perturbation theory, where $N$ is the number of QCD colors. We assume that $1/N \sim 1/N_F \sim m_s / Λ\gg m_{u,d}/Λ, α_{EM}$, where $N_F$ is the number of light quark flavors, and $m_{u,d,s} / Λ$ are the parameters controlling $SU(N_F)$ flavor breaking in chiral perturbation theory. We consistently include non-analytic contributions to the baryon masses at orders $m_q^{3/2}$, $m_q^2 \ln m_q$, and $(m_q \ln m_q) / N$. The $m_q^{3/2}$ corrections are small for the relations that follow from $SU(N_F)$ symmetry alone, but the corrections to the large-$N$ relations are large and have the wrong sign. Chiral power-counting and large-$N$ consistency allow a 2-loop contribution at order $m_q^2 \ln m_q$, and a non-trivial explicit calculation is required to show that this contribution vanishes. At second order in the expansion, there are eight relations that are non-trivial consequences of the $1/N$ expansion, all of which are well satisfied within the experimental errors. The average deviation at this order is $7 \MeV$ for the $\De I = 0$ mass differences and $0.35 \MeV$ for the $\De I \ne 0$ mass differences, consistent with the expectation that the error is of order $1/N^2 \sim 10\%$.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.