Paper detail

Baryon Dynamics, Dark Matter Substructure, and Galaxies

By comparing a collisionless cosmological N-body simulation (DM) to an SPH simulation with the same initial conditions, we investigate the correspondence between the dark matter subhalos produced by collisionless dynamics and the galaxies produced by dissipative gas dynamics in a dark matter background. When galaxies in the SPH simulation become satellites in larger groups, they retain local dark matter concentrations (SPH subhalos) whose mass is typically five times their baryonic mass. The more massive subhalos of the SPH simulation have corresponding subhalos of similar mass and position in the DM simulation; at lower masses, there is fairly good correspondence, but some DM subhalos are in different spatial positions and some suffer tidal stripping or disruption. The halo occupation statistics of DM subhalos -- the mean number of subhalos, pairs, and triples as a function of host halo mass -- are very similar to those of SPH subhalos and SPH galaxies. Gravity of the dissipative baryon component amplifies the density contrast of subhalos in the SPH simulation, making them more resistant to tidal disruption. Relative to SPH galaxies and SPH subhalos, the DM subhalo population is depleted in the densest regions of the most massive halos. The good agreement of halo occupation statistics between the DM subhalo and SPH galaxy populations leads to good agreement of their two-point correlation functions and higher order moments on large scales. The depletion of DM subhalos in dense regions depresses their clustering at R<1 Mpc/h. In these simulations, the "conversation" between dark matter and baryons is mostly one-way, with dark matter dynamics telling galaxies where to form and how to cluster, but the "back talk" of the baryons influences small scale clustering by enhancing the survival of substructure in the densest environments.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.