Paper detail

Bargmann-Fock percolation is noise sensitive

We show that planar Bargmann-Fock percolation is noise sensitive under the Ornstein-Ulhenbeck process. The proof is based on the randomized algorithm approach introduced by Schramm and Steif and gives quantitative polynomial bounds on the noise sensitivity of crossing events for Bargmann-Fock. A rather counter-intuitive consequence is as follows. Let $F$ be a Bargmann-Fock Gaussian field in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and consider two horizontal planes $P_1,P_2$ at small distance $\varepsilon$ from each other. Even though $F$ is a.s. analytic, the above noise sensitivity statement implies that the full restriction of $F$ to $P_1$ (i.e. $F_{| P_1}$) gives almost no information on the percolation configuration induced by $F_{|P_2}$. As an application of this noise sensitivity analysis, we provide a Schramm-Steif based proof that the near-critical window of level line percolation around $\ell_c=0$ is polynomially small. This new approach extends earlier sharp threshold results to a larger family of planar Gaussian fields.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.