Paper detail

Barbosa, Uniform Polynomial Time Bounds, and Promises

This note is a commentary on, and critique of, Andre Luiz Barbosa's paper entitled "P != NP Proof." Despite its provocative title, what the paper is seeking to do is not to prove P \neq NP in the standard sense in which that notation is used in the literature. Rather, Barbosa is (and is aware that he is) arguing that a different meaning should be associated with the notation P \neq NP, and he claims to prove the truth of the statement P \neq NP in his quite different sense of that statement. However, we note that (1) the paper fails even on its own terms, as due to a uniformity problem, the paper's proof does not establish, even in its unusual sense of the notation, that P \neq NP; and (2) what the paper means by the claim P \neq NP in fact implies that P \neq NP holds even under the standard meaning that that notation has in the literature (and so it is exceedingly unlikely that Barbosa's proof can be fixed any time soon).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.