Paper detail

$Λ_{\bar{\textrm{MS}}}^{(n_f=2)}$ from a momentum space analysis of the quark-antiquark static potential

We determine $Λ_{\bar{\textrm{MS}}}^{(n_f=2)}$ by fitting perturbative expressions for the quark-antiquark static potential to lattice results for QCD with $n_f=2$ dynamical quark flavors. To this end we use the perturbative static potential at the presently best known accuracy, i.e. up to ${\cal O}(α_s^4)$, in momentum space. The lattice potential is computed on a fine lattice with $a \approx 0.042 \, \textrm{fm}$ in position space. To allow for a comparison and matching of both results, the lattice potential is transformed into momentum space by means of a discrete Fourier transform. The value of $Λ_{\bar{\textrm{MS}}}^{(n_f=2)}$ is extracted in momentum space. All sources of statistical and systematic errors are discussed. The uncertainty in the value of $Λ_{\bar{\textrm{MS}}}^{(n_f=2)}$ is found to be smaller than that obtained in a recent position space analysis of the static potential based on the same lattice data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.