Paper detail

Bandwidth smearing in infrared long-baseline interferometry. Application to stellar companion search in fringe-scanning mode

In long-baseline interferometry, bandwidth smearing of an extended source occurs at finite bandwidth when its different components produce interference packets that only partially overlap. In this case, traditional model fitting or image reconstruction using standard formulas and tools lead to biased results. We propose and implement a method to overcome this effect by calculating analytically a corrective term for the conventional interferometric observables: the visibility amplitude and closure phase. For that purpose, we model the interferogram taking into account the finite bandwidth and the instrumental differential phase. We obtain generic expressions for the visibility and closure phase in the case of temporally-modulated interferograms, either processed using Fourier analysis or with the ABCD method. The expressions can be used to fit arbitrary models to the data. We then apply our results to the search and characterisation of stellar companions with PIONIER at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer, assessing the bias on observables and model-fitted parameters of a binary star. Finally, we consider the role of the atmosphere, with an analytic model to identify the main contributions to bias and also a numerical simulation of the turbulence. In addition to the analytic expressions, the main results of our study are: the chromatic dispersion in the beam transport in the instrument has a strong impact on the closure phase and introduces additional biases even at separations where smearing is not expected to play an important role; the atmospheric turbulence introduces additional biases when smearing is present, but the impact is important only at very low spectral resolution; the bias on the observables strongly depends on the recombination scheme and data processing; the goodness of fits is improved by modelling a Gaussian bandpass as long as the smearing is moderate.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.