Paper detail

Balancing Degree, Diameter and Weight in Euclidean Spanners

In this paper we devise a novel \emph{unified} construction of Euclidean spanners that trades between the maximum degree, diameter and weight gracefully. For a positive integer k, our construction provides a (1+eps)-spanner with maximum degree O(k), diameter O(log_k n + alpha(k)), weight O(k \cdot log_k n \cdot log n) \cdot w(MST(S)), and O(n) edges. Note that for k= n^{1/alpha(n)} this gives rise to diameter O(alpha(n)), weight O(n^{1/alpha(n)} \cdot log n \cdot alpha(n)) \cdot w(MST(S)) and maximum degree O(n^{1/alpha(n)}), which improves upon a classical result of Arya et al. \cite{ADMSS95}; in the corresponding result from \cite{ADMSS95} the spanner has the same number of edges and diameter, but its weight and degree may be arbitrarily large. Also, for k = O(1) this gives rise to maximum degree O(1), diameter O(log n) and weight O(log^2 n) \cdot w(MST(S)), which reproves another classical result of Arya et al. \cite{ADMSS95}. Our bound of O(log_k n + alpha(k)) on the diameter is optimal under the constraints that the maximum degree is O(k) and the number of edges is O(n). Our bound on the weight is optimal up to a factor of log n. Our construction also provides a similar tradeoff in the complementary range of parameters, i.e., when the weight should be smaller than log^2 n, but the diameter is allowed to grow beyond log n. For random point sets in the d-dimensional unit cube, we "shave" a factor of log n from the weight bound. Specifically, in this case our construction achieves maximum degree O(k), diameter O(log_k n + alpha(k)) and weight that is with high probability O(k \cdot log_k n) \cdot w(MST(S)). Finally, en route to these results we devise optimal constructions of 1-spanners for general tree metrics, which are of independent interest.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.