Paper detail

Balancing Between Over-Weighting and Under-Weighting in Supervised Term Weighting

Supervised term weighting could improve the performance of text categorization. A way proven to be effective is to give more weight to terms with more imbalanced distributions across categories. This paper shows that supervised term weighting should not just assign large weights to imbalanced terms, but should also control the trade-off between over-weighting and under-weighting. Over-weighting, a new concept proposed in this paper, is caused by the improper handling of singular terms and too large ratios between term weights. To prevent over-weighting, we present three regularization techniques: add-one smoothing, sublinear scaling and bias term. Add-one smoothing is used to handle singular terms. Sublinear scaling and bias term shrink the ratios between term weights. However, if sublinear functions scale down term weights too much, or the bias term is too large, under-weighting would occur and harm the performance. It is therefore critical to balance between over-weighting and under-weighting. Inspired by this insight, we also propose a new supervised term weighting scheme, regularized entropy (re). Our re employs entropy to measure term distribution, and introduces the bias term to control over-weighting and under-weighting. Empirical evaluations on topical and sentiment classification datasets indicate that sublinear scaling and bias term greatly influence the performance of supervised term weighting, and our re enjoys the best results in comparison with existing schemes.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.