Paper detail

Balancing adaptability and predictability: K-revision multistage stochastic programming

A standard assumption in multistage stochastic programming is that decisions are made after observing the uncertainty from the prior stage. The resulting solutions can be difficult to implement in practice, as they leave practitioners ill-prepared for future stages. To provide better foresight, we introduce the K-revision approach. This new framework requires plans to be specified in advance. To maintain flexibility, we allow plans to be revised a maximum of K times as new information becomes available. We analyze the complexity of K-revision problems, showing NP-hardness even in a simple setting. We examine, both theoretically and computationally, the impact of the K-revision approach on the objective compared with classical multistage stochastic programming models and the partially adaptive approach introduced in [1, 2]. We develop two MIP formulations, one directly from our definition and the other based on a combinatorial characterization. We analyze the tightness of these formulations and propose several methods to strengthen them. Computational experiments on synthetic problems and practical applications demonstrate that our approach is both computationally tractable and effective in reaching near-optimal performance while increasing the predictability of the solutions produced.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.