Paper detail

Balanced reconstruction codes for single edits

Motivated by the sequence reconstruction problem initiated by Levenshtein, reconstruction codes were introduced by Cai \emph{et al}. to combat errors when a fixed number of noisy channels are available. The central problem on this topic is to design codes with sizes as large as possible, such that every codeword can be uniquely reconstructed from any $N$ distinct noisy reads, where $N$ is fixed. In this paper, we study binary reconstruction codes with the constraint that every codeword is balanced, which is a common requirement in the technique of DNA-based storage. For all possible channels with a single edit error and their variants, we design asymptotically optimal balanced reconstruction codes for all $N$, and show that the number of their redundant symbols decreases from $\frac{3}{2}\log_2 n+O(1)$ to $\frac{1}{2}\log_2n+\log_2\log_2n+O(1)$, and finally to $\frac{1}{2}\log_2n+O(1)$ but with different speeds, where $n$ is the length of the code. Compared with the unbalanced case, our results imply that the balanced property does not reduce the rate of the reconstruction code in the corresponding codebook.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.