Paper detail

Balanced normal cones and Fulton-MacPherson's intersection theory

Let X be a subscheme of a reduced scheme Y. Then Y has a flat "degeneration to the normal cone" C_X Y of X, and this degeneration plays a key step in Fulton and MacPherson's "basic construction" in intersection theory. The intersection product has a canonical refinement as a sum over the components of C_X Y, for X and Y depending on the given intersection problem. The cone C_X Y is usually not reduced, which leads to the appearance of multiplicities in intersection formulae. We describe a variant of this degeneration, due essentially to Samuel, Rees, and Nagata, in which Y flatly degenerates to the "balanced" normal cone \barC_X Y. This space is reduced, and has a natural map onto the reduction (C_X Y)_red of C_X Y. The multiplicity of a component now appears as the degree of this map. Hence intersection theory can be studied using only reduced schemes. Moreover, since the map \barC_X Y \to (C_X Y)_red may wrap multiple components of \barC_X Y around one component of C_X Y, writing the intersection product as a sum over the components of \barC_X Y gives a further canonical refinement. \\ In the case that X is a Cartier divisor in a projective scheme Y, we describe the balanced normal cone in homotopy-theoretic terms, and prove a useful upper bound on the Hilbert function of \barC_X Y.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.