Paper detail

Balanced metrics on the Fock-Bargmann-Hartogs domains

The Fock-Bargmann-Hartogs domain $D_{n,m}(μ)$ ($μ>0$) in $\mathbb{C}^{n+m}$ is defined by the inequality $\|w\|^2<e^{-μ\|z\|^2},$ where $(z,w)\in \mathbb{C}^n\times \mathbb{C}^m$, which is an unbounded non-hyperbolic domain in $\mathbb{C}^{n+m}$. This paper introduces a Kähler metric $αg(μ;ν)$ $(α>0)$ on $D_{n,m}(μ)$, where $g(μ;ν)$ is the Kähler metric associated with the Kähler potential $Φ(z,w):=μν{\Vert z\Vert}^{2}-\ln(e^{-μ{\Vert z\Vert}^{2}}-\Vert w\Vert^2)$ ($ν>-1$) on $D_{n,m}(μ)$. The purpose of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we obtain an explicit formula for the Bergman kernel of the weighted Hilbert space of square integrable holomorphic functions on $(D_{n,m}(μ), g(μ;ν))$ with the weight $\exp\{-αΦ\}$ for $α>0$. Secondly, using the explicit expression of the Bergman kernel, we obtain the necessary and sufficient condition for the metric $αg(μ;ν)$ $(α>0)$ on the domain $D_{n,m}(μ)$ to be a balanced metric. So we obtain the existence of balanced metrics for a class of Fock-Bargmann-Hartogs domains.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.