Paper detail

Balanced Allocation on Hypergraphs

We consider a variation of balls-into-bins which randomly allocates $m$ balls into $n$ bins. Following Godfrey's model (SODA, 2008), we assume that each ball $t$, $1\le t\le m$, comes with a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}^{(t)}=\{B_1,B_2,\ldots,B_{s_t}\}$, and each edge $B\in\mathcal{H}^{(t)}$ contains at least a logarithmic number of bins. Given $d\ge 2$, our $d$-choice algorithm chooses an edge $B\in \mathcal{H}^{(t)}$, uniformly at random, and then chooses a set $D$ of $d$ random bins from the selected edge $B$. The ball is allocated to a least-loaded bin from $D$, with ties are broken randomly. We prove that if the hypergraphs $\mathcal{H}^{(1)},\ldots, \mathcal{H}^{(m)}$ satisfy a \emph{balancedness} condition and have low \emph{pair visibility}, then after allocating $m=Θ(n)$ balls, the maximum number of balls at any bin, called the \emph{maximum load}, is at most $\log_d\log n+O(1)$, with high probability. The balancedness condition enforces that bins appear almost uniformly within the hyperedges of $\mathcal{H}^{(t)}$, $1\le t\le m$, while the pair visibility condition measures how frequently a pair of bins is chosen during the allocation of balls. Moreover, we establish a lower bound for the maximum load attained by the balanced allocation for a sequence of hypergraphs in terms of pair visibility, showing the relevance of the visibility parameter to the maximum load. In Godfrey's model, each ball is forced to probe all bins in a randomly selected hyperedge and the ball is then allocated in a least-loaded bin. Godfrey showed that if each $\mathcal{H}^{(t)}$, $1\le t\le m$, is balanced and $m=O(n)$, then the maximum load is at most one, with high probability. However, we apply the power of $d$ choices paradigm, and only query the load information of $d$ random bins per ball, while achieving very slow growth in the maximum load.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.