Paper detail

BACOM 2.0 facilitates absolute normalization and quantification of somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor

BACOM is a statistically principled and unsupervised method that detects copy number deletion types (homozygous versus heterozygous), estimates normal cell fraction, and recovers cancer specific copy number profiles, using allele specific copy number signals. In a subsequent analysis of TCGA ovarian cancer dataset, the average normal cell fraction estimated by BACOM was found higher than expected. In this letter, we first discuss the advantages of the BACOM in relation to alternative approaches. Then, we show that this elevated estimate of normal cell fraction is the combined result of inaccurate signal modeling and normalization. Lastly, we describe an allele specific signal modeling and normalization scheme that can enhance BACOM applications in many biological contexts. An open source MATLAB program was developed to implement our extended method and it is publically available.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.