Paper detail

Background fitness, eco-evolutionary feedbacks and the Hawk-Dove game

This paper further develops work from a previous article which introduced a new way of modelling evolutionary game models with an emphasis on ecological realism, concerned with how ecological factors determine payoffs in evolutionary games. The current paper is focused on the impact of selectively neutral factors (i.e. those that are the same for all strategies), such as background fitness and a neutral density dependence on game dynamics. In the previous paper background mortality was modelled by post-reproductive mortality describing aggregated mortality between game interactions. In this paper a novel approach to the modelling of background fitness, based on different occurrence rates (intensities) of game interactions and background events is presented. It is shown that the new method is more realistic and natural for dynamic models than the method used in the previous paper. The previous method in effect produces biased trajectories, but it is compatible with the new approach at the restpoints. Also in this paper a rigorous stability analysis of the restpoints of the dynamics is presented. It is shown that the stability or instability of the restpoints, can be explained by a mechanism of eco-evolutionary feedback. The results obtained are illustrated by a Hawk-Dove game example.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.