Paper detail

$b\to sγ$ and $ε_1$ Constraints on Supergravity Models

In the light of the top quark discovered very recently by CDF, we investigate the possibility of narrowing down the allowed top quark masses by combining for the first time only two strongest constraints present in the no-scale $SU(5)\times U(1)$ supergravity model, namely, the ones from the flavor-changing radiative decay $b\rightarrow sγ$ and the precision measurements at LEP in the form of $ε_{1}$. It turns out that even without including the most devastating constraint from $\Zbb$ measurement at LEP in the form of $R_b$ directly or $ε_b$ indirectly, the combined constraint from $b\rightarrow sγ$ and $ε_1$ alone in fact excludes $m_t(m_t)\gsim 180\GeV$ altogether in the no-scale model, providing a constraint on $m_t$ near the upper end of the CDF values. The resulting upper bound on $m_t$ is stronger and $5 \GeV$ lower than the one from combining $ε_1$ and $ε_b$ constraints and also combining $b\rightarrow sγ$ and $ε_b $ constraints in the previous analysis.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.