Paper detail

B $\to$ $π$ form factor with 2 flavours of $O(a)$ improved Wilson quarks

The determinations of $|V_{\rm ub}|$ from the exclusive branching ratios of $B\to τν$ and $B \to πl ν$ tend to show a tension at the level of $3σ$ \cite{Beringer:1900zz}. On the theoretical side they depend on the lattice computation of the hadronic matrix elements $f_{\rm B}$ and the $B\to π$ form factor $f_+(q^2)$. To understand the tension, improved precision and a careful analysis of the systematics involved are necessary. Working towards this goal, we present preliminary lattice results of the ALPHA collaboration for the $B\to π$ form factor $f_+(q^2)$ with $N_{\rm f}=2$ flavours of $O(a)$-improved Wilson fermions. Our computation uses HQET in the static limit, pion masses ranging down to $\sim250$ MeV, large volumes with $m_πL >4$, three lattice spacings, and non-perturbative renormalization. We describe the techniques adopted to reduce the statistical noise (stochastic all-to-all with full time dilution) and the contamination from excited states (smearing for the B and the pion). We estimate the size of the chiral and continuum extrapolations. We discuss the impact our result could have to clarify the above mentioned discrepancy in the determination of $|V_{\rm ub}|$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.